United States v. Najera

46 F. App'x 512
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2002·No. No. 01-10011; D.C. No. CR-95-00457-MHP·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Felipe Najera appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession and distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a brief stating that counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous issues for review. Because our independent review of the record and the briefs on appeal pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Najera knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Martinez, 143 F.3d 1266, 1270-72 (9th Cir. 1998) (enforcing waiver of right to appeal where waiver is knowing and voluntary and sentence is in accordance with plea agreement).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Najera, 46 F. App'x 512 (9th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 512 (United States v. Najera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)