United States v. Muse

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Muse

475 F. App'x 924

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 21, 2012

DocketNo. 12-6754

StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 924 (United States v. Muse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Muse, 475 F. App'x 924 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

• Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Muse appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying her motion to dismiss the writ of continuing garnishment entered against her. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We grant the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Muse appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying her motion to dismiss the writ of continuing garnishment entered against her. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We grant the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F. App'x 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-muse-ca4-2012.