United States v. Muse

292 F. App'x 862
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 12, 2008·No. No. 08-10760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Michael Muse in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Muse’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Muse, 292 F. App'x 862 (11th Cir. 2008).

292 F. App'x 862 (United States v. Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)