United States v. Murray

671 F. App'x 747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 2016
DocketNo. 15-13448 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 747 (United States v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Murray, 671 F. App'x 747 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAlM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Aaron Murray in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) because she finds the appeal “wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Murray’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murray’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murray-ca11-2016.