United States v. Murray

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Murray

671 F. App'x 747

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 30, 2016·No. No. 15-13448 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAlM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Aaron Murray in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) because she finds the appeal “wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Murray’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murray’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAlM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Aaron Murray in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) because she finds the appeal “wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Murray’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murray’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Murray, 671 F. App'x 747 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 747 (United States v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related