United States v. Murphy

9 F. 26
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. 26 (United States v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Murphy, 9 F. 26 (uscirct 1881).

Opinion

Swing, D. J.

The indictment is drawn under section 5439 of the Revised Statutes. The two counts, differing somewhat in form, charge that the defendant has applied to his own use an overcoat which had been issued to an inmate of the National Military Home at Dayton, to be used by him for the military service of the United States. A demurrer to this indictment raises the question whether clothing so issued to inmates of that institution is within the prohibition of that section. The preceding section (5438) prohibits the purchase of clothing, etc., from any soldier or other person called into or employed in the military service of the United States, such soldier or person not having the lawful right to sell the same. This section (5439) then prohibits any person from knowingly applying to h'is own use any clothing or other property of the United States furnished or to be used for the military service. Under section 5438 the clothing must be purchased from a person “in- the military service;” under section 5439 it must be clothing or other property of the United States “furnished or to be used for the military service.” The indictment, it is true, charges in one count that the overcoat in question was “furnished for the military service,” and in the other that it was “to be used for the military service,” but in each it appears it had been issued to an inmate of the home.

It was claimed in argument on behalf of the government that these military homes are a part of the military establishment, and. clothing issued to the inmates is furnished and used for the military service. It is clear that the inmates of these homes are not in the military [27]*27service. It is not claimed that section 5138 applies to the purchase of clothing from them; nor do I think that the clothing issued "to them is used in the military service of the United States.

Congress could probably prohibit the purchase of clothing from these inmates, and punish any one applying it to other purposes than that for which it is issued; hut the law in force does not apply to it, and the demurrer must be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murphy-uscirct-1881.