United States v. Murphy

383 F. App'x 432
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2010·No. No. 09-10696·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Darrell Murphy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Murphy has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Murphy, 383 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2010).

383 F. App'x 432 (United States v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)