United States v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 00-50286·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50286 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES EDWARD MURPHY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-92-1 -------------------- April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Murphy has

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Murphy has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Murphy, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Murphy (United States v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)