United States v. Murphy

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Murphy

32 F. App'x 72

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2002·No. 01-8095·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Betty Jean Murphy appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of her term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Murphy, Nos. CR-89-280; CA-01-858-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Betty Jean Murphy appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of her term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Murphy, Nos. CR-89-280; CA-01-858-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Murphy, 32 F. App'x 72 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

32 F. App'x 72 (United States v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.