United States v. Murphy

123 F.2d 1008, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 1941
DocketNo. 7785
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 F.2d 1008 (United States v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Murphy, 123 F.2d 1008, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871 (3d Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant failed to show that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict of guilt as to the first, second, third, fifth, seventh and ninth counts of the indictment, any one of the offenses therein charged, except for the ninth count, alone being sufficient to support the general sentence imposed by the court. The presumption of law is that the court sentenced ror tne defendant’s guilt of the sustained counts. Pierce et al. v. United States, 252 U.S. 239, 252, 253, 40 S.Ct. 205, 64 L.Ed. 542; Evans v. United States (No. 2), 153 U. S. 608, 609, 14 S.Ct. 939, 38 L.Ed. 839; Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140, 146, 147, 12 S.Ct. 169, 35 L.Ed. 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F.2d 1008, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murphy-ca3-1941.