United States v. Murphy
This text of 123 F.2d 1008 (United States v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant failed to show that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict of guilt as to the first, second, third, fifth, seventh and ninth counts of the indictment, any one of the offenses therein charged, except for the ninth count, alone being sufficient to support the general sentence imposed by the court. The presumption of law is that the court sentenced ror tne defendant’s guilt of the sustained counts. Pierce et al. v. United States, 252 U.S. 239, 252, 253, 40 S.Ct. 205, 64 L.Ed. 542; Evans v. United States (No. 2), 153 U. S. 608, 609, 14 S.Ct. 939, 38 L.Ed. 839; Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140, 146, 147, 12 S.Ct. 169, 35 L.Ed. 966.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 F.2d 1008, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murphy-ca3-1941.