United States v. Murchison
71 M.J. 9, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1084
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
DocketNo. 12-0131/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 9 (United States v. Murchison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Murchison, 71 M.J. 9, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1084 (Ark. 2011).
Opinion
CCA 20101052. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE AS IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fosler
70 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 9, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-murchison-armfor-2011.