United States v. Munoz-Hernandez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Munoz-Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 F. App'x 243
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2002·No. 01-50697·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50697 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE HUGO MUNOZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Hugo Sanchez-Vasquez,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-162-1 -------------------- June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bryan P. Cartall, counsel appointed to represent Jose Hugo

Munoz-Hernandez, has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Munoz-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-20376 -2-

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Munoz-Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Munoz-Hernandez (United States v. Munoz-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)