United States v. Munoz
This text of 131 F. App'x 593 (United States v. Munoz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Munoz appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
[594]*594We vacate and remand for the district court to resentence Munoz consistent with the principles announced by the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-munoz-ca9-2005.