United States v. Munoz

5 F. App'x 705
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2001
DocketNo. 00-10263; D.C. No. CR-00-40008-CW
StatusPublished

This text of 5 F. App'x 705 (United States v. Munoz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Munoz, 5 F. App'x 705 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Jose Espinoza-Munoz appeals from his guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, as charged in a one-count indictment. The government concedes that Mu[706]*706noz was not properly told of the elements of the charge to which he pled guilty, as required under Fed. R. Crim P. 11(c)(1). Specifically, Munoz was not told that alien-age is an element of a charge under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The government agrees with the defendant that this failure during the change of plea hearing necessitates a vacation of the guilty plea. Given the circumstances, we vacate the guilty plea and remand for further proceedings. See United States v. Longoria, 113 F.3d 975, 977 (9th Cir.1997).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F. App'x 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-munoz-ca9-2001.