United States v. Muniz
71 F.3d 93, 1995 WL 747946
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 6, 1995·No. No. 1163, Docket 94-1470·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
It is HEREBY Ordered that the majority opinion, filed on June 29, 1995, 60 F.3d 65, is amended as follows:
Page 5301, line 12 (at end of sentence “... from the jury’s consideration.”), add footnote, as follows:
We note in response to the petition for rehearing that the following discussion is included as guidance for trial judges. The gun has not been considered as part of the evidence justifying the finding of sufficiency to pass the “plain error” test.
So Ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Muniz, 71 F.3d 93, 1995 WL 747946 (2d Cir. 1995).
71 F.3d 93 (United States v. Muniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., Hyperlaw, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. West Publishing Co. West Publishing Corporation
158 F.3d 693 (Second Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Jose Muniz
71 F.3d 93 (Second Circuit, 1995)