United States v. Muniz
71 F.3d 93, 1995 WL 747946
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1995
DocketNo. 1163, Docket 94-1470
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 71 F.3d 93 (United States v. Muniz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Muniz, 71 F.3d 93, 1995 WL 747946 (2d Cir. 1995).
Opinion
It is HEREBY Ordered that the majority opinion, filed on June 29, 1995, 60 F.3d 65, is amended as follows:
Page 5301, line 12 (at end of sentence “... from the jury’s consideration.”), add footnote, as follows:
We note in response to the petition for rehearing that the following discussion is included as guidance for trial judges. The gun has not been considered as part of the evidence justifying the finding of sufficiency to pass the “plain error” test.
So Ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., Hyperlaw, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. West Publishing Co. West Publishing Corporation
158 F.3d 693 (Second Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Jose Muniz
71 F.3d 93 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 F.3d 93, 1995 WL 747946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-muniz-ca2-1995.