United States v. Mullins
This text of United States v. Mullins (United States v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-61173 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONDALL MULLINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:02-CR-60-MPM-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rondall Mullins appeals the district court’s revocation of his
supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment. See
18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). He argues that the district court erred in
not imposing substance-abuse treatment pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§3583(d) in lieu of incarceration. Mullins committed several
violations of the conditions of his supervised release. Failure of
a drug test was but one of those violations. Moreover, the
district court considered but rejected the available treatment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-61173 -2-
options. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Accordingly, there was no error
in the district court’s revocation of supervised release and
imposition of a term of imprisonment.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mullins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mullins-ca5-2006.