United States v. Muhammad
This text of 672 F. App'x 324 (United States v. Muhammad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order granting the motion of the United States for the return of Jencks Act material. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note that an agreed discovery order provided that the material would be returned to the United States at the conclusion of the case. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00055-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 17, 2016). We deny the motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argumént because the facts and legal con[325]*325tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
672 F. App'x 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-muhammad-ca4-2017.