United States v. Muhammad

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Muhammad

672 F. App'x 324

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2017·No. No. 16-7065·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order granting the motion of the United States for the return of Jencks Act material. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note that an agreed discovery order provided that the material would be returned to the United States at the conclusion of the case. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00055-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 17, 2016). We deny the motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argumént because the facts and legal con[325] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa Muhammad appeals the district court’s order granting the motion of the United States for the return of Jencks Act material. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note that an agreed discovery order provided that the material would be returned to the United States at the conclusion of the case. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00055-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 17, 2016). We deny the motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argumént because the facts and legal con[325] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Muhammad, 672 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 324 (United States v. Muhammad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.