United States v. Mowry

154 U.S. 564, 14 S. Ct. 1213, 19 L. Ed. 256, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1091
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 12, 1869
Docket186
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 154 U.S. 564 (United States v. Mowry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mowry, 154 U.S. 564, 14 S. Ct. 1213, 19 L. Ed. 256, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1091 (1869).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Nelson

delivered the opinion-of the court.

This is an appeal from the Court of Claims.

The petition of Mowry sets forth that railroad cars were needed on the Pacific Railroad, in Missouri, for the transportation of men and supplies in the military department of the West, then in command of General Fremont, and that, on the 22d September, 1861, he made a contract with Chief Quartermaster McKinstry, at the head of that department under General Fremont, to construct fifty box cars and fifty platform cars, the former for- $825 each, and the latter for $700 each. These cars were afterwards constructed, approved and taken into the service of-the government.

The payment of the price on this contract was among many others within that military district, suspended upon allegations of fraud and irregularities committed therein, and a board of commissioners- appointed to investigate them and report to the Secretary of War. The petitioner presented his claim before this board, charging the contract price, amounting to $76,250. This board, after investigation, allowed to the petitioner $58,750, and gave him a voucher for that amount, the payment of which was accepted by him from the government, as provided for by an act of Congress; The Court of Claims allowed the balance of the contract price; $17,250.

The case falls within the decision of this court just rendered in the case of The United States v. Adams, 7 Wall. 463. Under the circumstances the petitioner is concluded by the finding of the board and acceptance of payment.

The decree must be

*565 Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dickey and Mr. E. P. Norton for appellant. Mr. R. M. Corwine, Mr. J. M. Carlisle and Mr. J. D. McPherson for appellee.

Reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to enter a decree dismissing the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United States
268 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Paulson v. County
137 N.W. 486 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 U.S. 564, 14 S. Ct. 1213, 19 L. Ed. 256, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mowry-scotus-1869.