United States v. Moss

905 F.3d 357
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 8, 2018
DocketNo. 18-10215
StatusPublished

This text of 905 F.3d 357 (United States v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Moss, 905 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Moss has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moss has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 F.3d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moss-ca5-2018.