United States v. Moss

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Moss

905 F.3d 357

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2018·No. No. 18-10215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Moss has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moss has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Moss has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moss has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States v. Moss, 905 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

905 F.3d 357 (United States v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related