United States v. Moses
This text of 320 F. App'x 718 (United States v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joey Moses appeals from the 35-year sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for murder with use of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111(a), 1153(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii), [719]*719respectively. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Moses contends his sentence is unreasonable, based on the district court’s apparent finding that he was not credible. Despite its reservations, the district court granted a substantial assistance departure that allowed it to impose a sentence within the Guidelines, instead of imposing a life sentence. We conclude the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moses-ca9-2009.