United States v. Moses

111 F. App'x 278
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 13, 2004·No. 04-40026·Unpublished

Opinion

*279 PER CURIAM: *

Court-appointed counsel for Michael Lynn Moses has filed a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). An independent review of counsel’s brief, Moses’s response, and the record reflects that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, Moses’s motion for the appointment of substitute appellate counsel is DENIED; counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Moses, 111 F. App'x 278 (5th Cir. 2004).

111 F. App'x 278 (United States v. Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)