United States v. Moseley (In re Moseley)
This text of 101 B.R. 608 (United States v. Moseley (In re Moseley)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The trial court issued an order which partially denied an Internal Revenue Service tax claim against Patricia S. Moseley, a Chapter 13 debtor. In re Moseley, 74 B.R. 791 (C.Cal.1987). While this appeal was pending, Moseley’s petition was dismissed because she failed to make the payments required by her plan.
When events subsequent to the filing of an appeal divest an appellate court of the power to decide questions which affect the rights of parties, as here, the appeal is moot and nonjusticiable. Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 402, 95 S.Ct. 553, 558, 42 L.Ed.2d 532 (1975); Aguirre v. S.S. Sohio, Intrepid, 801 F.2d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir.1986). The general practice in such a ease is to dismiss the appeal and vacate the order from which it arose. United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
Appeal DISMISSED and order VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 B.R. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moseley-in-re-moseley-bap9-1989.