United States v. Morton Mayer Sobel
This text of 443 F.2d 1370 (United States v. Morton Mayer Sobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
443 F.2d 1370
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Morton Mayer SOBEL, Appellant.
No. 71-1124.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 15, 1971.
Richard G. Sherman (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Tom G. Kontos, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed.
We find the government, once sanity was an issue, did not sustain its burden of proof.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 F.2d 1370, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morton-mayer-sobel-ca9-1971.