United States v. Morton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morton. Read the opinion of the Court — 984 F.3d 421
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2021·No. 19-10842·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

___________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10842

FILED

May 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Brian Matthew Morton,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-17-1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion January 5, 2021, 5 Cir., 2021, 984 F.3d 421)

Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

No. 19-10842

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated January 5, 2021, is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morton, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Morton (United States v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.