United States v. Morton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morton. Read the opinion of the Court — 984 F.3d 421
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2021·No. 19-10842·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ___________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10842 FILED May 18, 2021 ___________ Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Brian Matthew Morton,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-17-1 ______________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion January 5, 2021, 5 Cir., 2021, 984 F.3d 421)

Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, No. 19-10842

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated January 5, 2021, is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morton, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Morton (United States v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Morton
984 F.3d 421 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)