United States v. Morsette
This text of 307 F. App'x 113 (United States v. Morsette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Gina Marie Morsette challenges her 108-month prison sentence for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Morsette maintains that the district court erroneously relied on the uncorroborated hearsay statement of another methamphetamine dealer to calculate her base offense level. We agree.
The uncorroborated hearsay statement lacked sufficient indicia of reliability to support the determination that 1.5 kilograms or more of methamphetamine were attributable to Morsette. See United States v. Garcia-Sanchez, 189 F.3d 1143, 1149 (9th Cir.1999). On remand, the district court is to calculate the sentence without relying on the hearsay statement.
VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 F. App'x 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morsette-ca9-2009.