United States v. Morrow

10 M.J. 307, 1981 CMA LEXIS 16068
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morrow. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 M.J. 328
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided March 9, 1981·No. No. 39,726; NCM 80 0179·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The Acting Judge Advocate General of the United States Navy certified the following issue to this Court:

Whether the United States Navy Court of Military Review was correct in construing the action of the convening authority to have resulted in the approval of the punitive discharge?

As in United States v. Loft, 10 M.J. 266 (C.M.A.1981), the convening authority suspended an adjudged bad-conduct discharge, but did not explicitly approve it. Unlike Loft, however, a panel of the United States Navy Court of Military Review held that the convening authority had implicitly approved the bad-conduct discharge. We agree for the reasons set out in Loft.

Accordingly, the certified question is answered in the affirmative and the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morrow, 10 M.J. 307, 1981 CMA LEXIS 16068 (cma 1981).

10 M.J. 307 (United States v. Morrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Loft
10 M.J. 266 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)