United States v. Morrissette

71 M.J. 374, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 912
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided August 6, 2012·No. No. 11-0282/AR·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

CCA 20090166. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE DEFECTS IN SPECIFICATIONS 4, 5, AND 6 OF CHARGE III RESULTED IN MATERIAL PREJUDICE TO APPELLANT’S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT TO NOTICE.

The portion of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge III, Specifications 4, 5, and 6, and the sentence is reversed. United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012). The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to that court for further reconsideration in light of Humphries.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morrissette, 71 M.J. 374, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 912 (Ark. 2012).

71 M.J. 374 (United States v. Morrissette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Private E1 BOBBY D. MORRISSETTE
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2013