United States v. Morrison

Second Circuit

United States v. Morrison

199 F. App'x 40

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 25, 2006·No. No. 06-3621-cr·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Rodney Morrison appeals from a memorandum and order of the [41]*41District Court, see United States v. Morrison, No. 04-CR-699, 2006 WL 2053729 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 2006), denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson’s denial of his renewed bail application. See Bail Hr’g Tr. at 61-65.

Upon a review of the record, and substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Hurley’s careful and comprehensive order, we conclude that the District Court committed no error.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Rodney Morrison appeals from a memorandum and order of the [41]*41District Court, see United States v. Morrison, No. 04-CR-699, 2006 WL 2053729 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 2006), denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson’s denial of his renewed bail application. See Bail Hr’g Tr. at 61-65.

Upon a review of the record, and substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Hurley’s careful and comprehensive order, we conclude that the District Court committed no error.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the District Court.

United States v. Morrison, 199 F. App'x 40 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

199 F. App'x 40 (United States v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.