Home/Fifth Circuit/United States v. Morris Thomas

United States v. Morris Thomas

479 F.2d 1326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 24, 1973
Docket73-1516
StatusPublished

This text of 479 F.2d 1326 (United States v. Morris Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Morris Thomas, 479 F.2d 1326 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In compliance with the mandate set forth in Anders v.. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully reviewed this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Neil L. Heimanson, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. King, 5th Cir. 1972, 456 F.2d 1243; United States v. Mills, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1397; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Charles Edward Minor, No. 30544 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409
444 F.2d 521 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills, No. 71-1219 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
446 F.2d 1397 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. James Dennis King
456 F.2d 1243 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F.2d 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morris-thomas-ca5-1973.