United States v. Morris
This text of 14 C.M.A. 446 (United States v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
The accused was convicted of unauthorized absence and communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 86 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 934, respectively. On review the board of review concluded that the accused was prejudiced as to the Article 134 offense by the absence of an instruction on the lesser offense of using provoking words and gestures. See United States v Hazard, 8 USCMA 530, 25 CMR 34. On this appeal the accused contends the board of review erred by affirming the lesser offense instead of directing a rehearing. For the reasons set out in United States v Patterson, 14 USCMA 441, 34 CMR 221, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 C.M.A. 446, 14 USCMA 446, 34 C.M.R. 226, 1964 CMA LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morris-cma-1964.