United States v. Morris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morris. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 F.4th 323
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2021·No. 20-10630·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-10630 Document: 00515855411 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED May 10, 2021 No. 20-10630 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eric Wayne Morris,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19-CR-573-1

Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Eric Wayne Morris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10630 Document: 00515855411 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/10/2021

No. 20-10630

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morris, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Morris (United States v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)