United States v. Morgan

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: February 12, 2025
• Docket: 24-20054
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-20054 Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED February 12, 2025 No. 24-20054 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Tramarcus Morgan,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-439-1 ______________________________

Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Tramarcus Morgan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morgan has filed a response in which he moves for leave to proceed pro se on appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-20054 Document: 59-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2025

No. 24-20054

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Morgan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).