United States v. Moreno

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Moreno

143 F. App'x 255

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 30, 2005·No. No. 04-16668; D.C. Docket No. 04-20305-CR-JEM·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Jorge Moreno in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moreno’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Jorge Moreno in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moreno’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Moreno, 143 F. App'x 255 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

143 F. App'x 255 (United States v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related