United States v. Morban

96 F. App'x 769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 2004
DocketNo. 03-1624
StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. App'x 769 (United States v. Morban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Morban, 96 F. App'x 769 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Pursuant to defendant’s guilty plea, the District Court sentenced defendant to 87 months of imprisonment, which the Court then adjusted to 60 months under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b) for time defendant had already served in New York State custody on a related conviction. On appeal, defendant argues that the Court erroneously denied him (1) a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) and (2) a downward departure on the combined bases of family circumstances and the aberrant nature of his conduct.

We have considered defendant’s first argument on appeal, and we find that it is without merit. With respect to appellant’s second argument, it is well settled that a district court’s denial of a downward departure is not appealable, see, e.g., United States v. Brovm, 98 F.3d 690, 692 (2d Cir.1996) (citation omitted), and defendant’s arguments that this case presents an exception to that rule are unavailing. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED insofar as the Court denied defendant a minor role adjustment, and defendant’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction insofar as it seeks review of the District Court’s denial of a downward departure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Douglas Brown
98 F.3d 690 (Second Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. App'x 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morban-ca2-2004.