United States v. Morales-Machuca

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morales-Machuca. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 F.3d 13
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 30, 2008·No. 06-1283·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 06-1283 07-1001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

DAVID MORALES-MACHUCA, QUESTER STERLING-SUÁREZ,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 17, 2008, is corrected as follows:

On p. 25, lines 4-11: Delete sentence beginning with "A sentence" and ending with "original)." and substitute with:

"We review sentences for reasonableness regardless of whether they fall inside or outside the applicable Guideline sentencing range. United States v. Jiménez-Beltre, 440 F.3d 514, 519 (1st Cir. 2006) (en banc). Nevertheless, "a defendant who attempts to brand a within-the-range sentence as unreasonable must carry a heavy burden." United States v. Van Anh, 523 F.3d 43, 59 (1st Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. Pelletier, 469 F.3d 194, 204 (1st Cir. 2006))."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morales-Machuca, (1st Cir. 2008).

United States v. Morales-Machuca (United States v. Morales-Machuca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Van Anh
523 F.3d 43 (First Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Joseph Pellether
469 F.3d 194 (First Circuit, 2006)