United States v. Morales
This text of United States v. Morales (United States v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50201 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GILMAR SALAS MORALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL -------------------- June 14, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has
filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Morales has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, Morales’s court-appointed attorney’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused from further
responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morales-ca5-2000.