United States v. Mora-Garcia
This text of 96 F. App'x 477 (United States v. Mora-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Mora-Garcia appeals the judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month sentence upon revo[478]*478cation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Mora-Garcia’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that she has found no meritorious issues for review, together with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant did not file a supplemental pro se brief, and the government did not file a brief.
Our consideration of counsel’s brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [478]*478courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mora-garcia-ca9-2004.