United States v. Mora
This text of 127 F. App'x 343 (United States v. Mora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Robert Alexander Mora appeals from his jury trial conviction for possession of body armor by a violent felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 931 and 924(a)(7). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
Mora contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict in this case. We agree. No rational juror [344]*344could find, based on the evidence the government presented at trial, that the body armor had been offered for sale in interstate commerce. See Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
REVERSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mora-ca9-2005.