United States v. Mora
This text of 472 F. App'x 208 (United States v. Mora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jose Mora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend special conditions of supervision and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and to expedite. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny appointment of counsel, deny Mora’s motion to expedite as moot, and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mora, No. 2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mora-ca4-2012.