United States v. Mora

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mora

472 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2012·No. No. 11-7673·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jose Mora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend special conditions of supervision and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and to expedite. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny appointment of counsel, deny Mora’s motion to expedite as moot, and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mora, No. 2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jose Mora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend special conditions of supervision and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and to expedite. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny appointment of counsel, deny Mora’s motion to expedite as moot, and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mora, No. 2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mora, 472 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

472 F. App'x 208 (United States v. Mora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.