United States v. Moore
104 F. App'x 640
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2004·No. No. 03-30407·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court properly denied Appellant’s motion to suppress. The record adequately supports the conclusion that Police Officer Robert Weaver had reásonable suspicion that Appellant and his companions were involved in criminal activity [641] when they were temporarily detained for questioning and frisked for weapons in the early morning of September 11, 2003. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Moore, 104 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2004).
104 F. App'x 640 (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. United States
543 U.S. 1015 (Supreme Court, 2004)