United States v. Moore

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Moore

405 F. App'x 455

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 541 F.3d 1323 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 20, 2010·No. 10-12917·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Martin Brandon Moore in Moore’s third direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *456 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record of Moore’s resentencing on Count II reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moore’s sentence is AFFIRMED. Moore’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Martin Brandon Moore in Moore’s third direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *456 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record of Moore’s resentencing on Count II reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moore’s sentence is AFFIRMED. Moore’s motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED as moot.

United States v. Moore, 405 F. App'x 455 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

405 F. App'x 455 (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related