United States v. Moore
This text of United States v. Moore (United States v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
J.W. MOORE; James Moore, a.k.a. "Buster"; Francis Williams, Defendants-Appellants.
Arlutha W. Smiley, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rosa Mae Smiley Williams, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-7047, 94-7051 and 94-7055.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
July 8, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. CR-93-310-N); Ira DeMent, Judge.
Before EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and MORAN* Senior District Judge. Prior Report: 168 F.3d 1234
PER CURIAM: The petition(s) for rehearing filed by appellants FRANCIS WILLIAMS, ARLUTHA W. SMILEY, and ROSA MAE WILLIAMS are DENIED.
Footnote 2 in the original opinion, however, is stricken altogether and this language is put in its place
as the new footnote 2: The evidence is detailed in Section III, addressing appellants' claims about multiple conspiracies, and in Section VI, where appellants' sentencing claims are addressed.
* Honorable James B. Moran, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Moore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moore-ca11-1999.