United States v. Moore

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Moore

181 F.3d 1205, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18030

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 8, 1999·No. Nos. 94-7047, 94-7051 and 94-7055·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petition(s) for rehearing filed by appellants FRANCIS WILLIAMS, AR-LUTHA W. SMILEY, and ROSA MAE WILLIAMS are DENIED.

Footnote 2 in the original opinion, however, is stricken altogether and this language is put in its place as the new footnote 2:

The evidence is detailed in Section III, addressing appellants’ claims about multiple conspiracies, and in Section VI, where appellants’ sentencing claims are addressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The petition(s) for rehearing filed by appellants FRANCIS WILLIAMS, AR-LUTHA W. SMILEY, and ROSA MAE WILLIAMS are DENIED.

Footnote 2 in the original opinion, however, is stricken altogether and this language is put in its place as the new footnote 2:

The evidence is detailed in Section III, addressing appellants’ claims about multiple conspiracies, and in Section VI, where appellants’ sentencing claims are addressed.

United States v. Moore, 181 F.3d 1205, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18030 (11th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

181 F.3d 1205 (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related