United States v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Moore

76 M.J. 409, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 630

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided June 22, 2017·No. No. 17-0323/AR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CCA 20140875. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: . '

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY FOUND THERE WAS NO REASONABLE POSSIBILITY THE IMPROPER PROPENSITY INSTRUCTION INVALIDATED BY THIS COURT IN UNITED STATES v. HILLS, 75 M.J. 360 (C.A.A.F. 2016), COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE PANEL’S GUILTY FINDING FOR SPECIFICATION 1 OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE I.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20140875. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: . '

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY FOUND THERE WAS NO REASONABLE POSSIBILITY THE IMPROPER PROPENSITY INSTRUCTION INVALIDATED BY THIS COURT IN UNITED STATES v. HILLS, 75 M.J. 360 (C.A.A.F. 2016), COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE PANEL’S GUILTY FINDING FOR SPECIFICATION 1 OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE I.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Moore, 76 M.J. 409, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 630 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

76 M.J. 409 (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related