United States v. Moore
76 M.J. 409, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 630
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJune 22, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0323/AR
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 76 M.J. 409 (United States v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Moore, 76 M.J. 409, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 630 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 20140875. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: . '
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRONEOUSLY FOUND THERE WAS NO REASONABLE POSSIBILITY THE IMPROPER PROPENSITY INSTRUCTION INVALIDATED BY THIS COURT IN UNITED STATES v. HILLS, 75 M.J. 360 (C.A.A.F. 2016), COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE PANEL’S GUILTY FINDING FOR SPECIFICATION 1 OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE I.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Specialist JUVENTINO TOVARCHAVEZ
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 409, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moore-armfor-2017.