United States v. Mooney
This text of United States v. Mooney (United States v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4433
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN DAVID MOONEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-02-231)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: March 22, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
W. Michael Frazier, FRAZIER & OXLEY, L.C., Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Miller A. Bushong III, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John David Mooney pled guilty to possession of a firearm
by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2)
(2000). On appeal, he alleges that the district court erred by
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We do not find
that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mooney’s
motion to withdraw. United States v. Ubakanma, 215 F.3d 421, 424
(4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm. We also deny Mooney’s motion to
stay case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mooney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mooney-ca4-2004.