United States v. Mooney

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mooney

90 F. App'x 59

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 22, 2004·No. No. 03-4433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John David Mooney pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (2000). On appeal, he alleges that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mooney’s motion to withdraw. United States v. Ubakanma, 215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Thus, we affirm. We also deny Mooney’s motion to stay case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John David Mooney pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2) (2000). On appeal, he alleges that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We do not find that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mooney’s motion to withdraw. United States v. Ubakanma, 215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Thus, we affirm. We also deny Mooney’s motion to stay case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Mooney, 90 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 59 (United States v. Mooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related