United States v. Moon

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 20, 2002
• Docket: 02-6616
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMAL ANTWAN MOON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-99-203, CA-01-432)

Submitted: July 19, 2002 Decided: September 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Antwan Moon, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jamal Antwan Moon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for

enlargement of the record, deny the motion for leave to take

deposition, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Moon, Nos. CR-99-203; CA-01-432 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 15, 2002,

entered Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED