United States v. Montoya-Rodriguez

607 F. App'x 380

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Footnotes

•

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Paulo Osiel Montoya-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Montoya-Rodriguez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the' relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Montoya-Rodriguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, ■ and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. . See' 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. '