United States v. Montoya
This text of United States v. Montoya (United States v. Montoya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-10604 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/18/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10604 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ March 18, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Raul Mancha Montoya,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-46-7 ______________________________
Before Davis, Willett, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Mancha Montoya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mancha Montoya has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Mancha
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10604 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/18/2024
No. 23-10604
Montoya’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or his claims that his guilty plea was coerced by counsel’s promises; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to any right Mancha Montoya may have to raise them on collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 175-78 & n.11 (5th Cir. 1984). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Mancha Montoya’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Montoya, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-montoya-ca5-2024.