United States v. Montoya

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

September 23, 1993    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________

No. 93-1211 

                                 JUAN CAMILO-MONTOYA,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                 Defendant, Appellee.

                                 ____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                     [Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

____________________

No. 93-1270 

                                    UNITED STATES,

                                      Appellee,

                                          v.

                                 JUAN CAMILO-MONTOYA,

                                Defendant, Appellant.

                                 ____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                 [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                         __________________________

____________________

Before

                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,
                                         ___________
                           Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Juan Camilo-Montoya on brief pro se.
            ___________________
            Edwin  J. Gale,  United  States  Attorney,  and James  H.  Leavey,
            ______________                                  _________________
        Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per  Curiam.   This  is a  consolidated appeal  from two
                 ___________

            district  court  orders -  one,  dated  January  6, 1993,  of

            District  Judge Torres  and  the second,  dated February  18,

            1993, of Senior District  Judge Boyle.  We have  reviewed the

            record and  the parties' briefs.   We affirm  essentially for

            the reasons stated in those respective orders.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________

-3-