United States v. Montgomery

269 F. App'x 664

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: March 10, 2008
• Docket: No. 07-30121
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Lorie Ann Montgomery appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 21-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Montgomery’s counsel has tiled a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been tiled.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.