United States v. Montgomery

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Montgomery

6 F. App'x 212

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 30, 2001

Docket01-6163

StatusUnpublished

This text of 6 F. App'x 212 (United States v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Montgomery, 6 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth M. Montgomery, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Montgomery, No. CR-98-289 (E.D.Va. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth M. Montgomery, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Montgomery, No. CR-98-289 (E.D.Va. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-montgomery-ca4-2001.