United States v. Montgomery

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Montgomery

141 F. App'x 891

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 19, 2005

DocketNo. 04-14188

StatusPublished

This text of 141 F. App'x 891 (United States v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Montgomery, 141 F. App'x 891 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Dwayne Montgomery, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [892]*892the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Montgomery’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Dwayne Montgomery, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [892]*892the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Montgomery’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 F. App'x 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-montgomery-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack