United States v. Montgomery

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Montgomery

141 F. App'x 891

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 19, 2005·No. No. 04-14188·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Dwayne Montgomery, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [892]*892the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Montgomery’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Dwayne Montgomery, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [892]*892the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Montgomery’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Montgomery, 141 F. App'x 891 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

141 F. App'x 891 (United States v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related